VA RETRO PAY PROJECT UPDATE 10: Many retirees have been
frustrated for months by a lack of information on the VA Retro Pay program
coming from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS). And for some
this frustration turned to anger when a 15 NOV self-imposed deadline for DFAS
was not attained. The deadline was to complete a review of pay records for
133,000 disabled retirees, that original pool of retirees potentially eligible
for retroactive "concurrent receipt" payments was missed without
explanation. The retro pay program, which so far has paid catch-up amounts
worth $200 million to disabled retirees, has been marred by several missed
deadlines and shoddy communication. But those failings will be addressed, a
senior DFAS official vowed in a 28 NOV interview with Military Update. Monies
due retirees resulted from a period when DFAS and the Department of Veterans
Affairs were still debating how to implement Combat-Related Special
Compensation (CRSC) and Concurrent Retirement and Disability Pay (CRDP). The
pays were enacted in 2003 and 2004 to begin to dismantle a ban on concurrent
receipt of military retirement and VA disability compensation. VA and DFAS
still struggle with the complexity of the payments, particularly with
compensating eligible retirees retroactively. Individual retro payments so far
have averaged about $1,800.
DFAS and VA officials, when they launched the VA Retro
Pay effort in SEP 06, said all payments would be made within a year. In August,
as that year drew to a close, officials said all but 33,000 files had been
reviewed. DFAS set a new deadline of mid-November to fully pay the original
pool of eligible retirees, many of whom are owed thousands. DFAS officials now
acknowledge that they didn't have a firm grasp on the facts when they revised
that deadline three months ago. As of 15 NOV, a total of 48,760 files of
disabled retirees still needed to have pay reviews completed to determine retro
pay eligibility. Also, DFAS officials say they don't have enough facts yet to
set a new completion of payment deadline. Lee Krushinski,
the senior executive has been acting director of operations for DFAS for three
weeks, since replacing Patrick Shine who retired 31 OCT. He said,
"We have not met customer expectations. I personally find that
unacceptable and apologize to all the VA Retro-eligible recipients." Krushinski promises to address VA Retro Pay problems. One
of his first steps is to improve communication. Letters are being sent
immediately to all retirees with files being reviewed and to 46,000 retirees
whose files have been reviewed but have no back pay due. It is "just unacceptable"
that these retirees weren't informed earlier. Communication with our customers
was not what I would call adequate, at all," he said.
The missed deadlines, and the inaccurate statements on
progress made earlier by DFAS and VA officials, were blamed in part on a
misunderstanding of data being supplied by Lockheed Martin, the contractor
hired to review files and calculate payments. The payments reported by Lockhead often only partially compensated retirees for
total retro pay due. For example, some retirees are eligible for both CRSC or
CRDP and can switch between the programs each year based which will pay more
for their personal circumstances. A retiree might be due two or three payments.
DFAS officials had misinterpreted Lockheed's monthly payment totals to mean
total retiree pay files reviewed and cleared. This fooled Pat Shine before he
retired. It also left Thomas J. Pamperin, deputy
director of the VA compensation and pension service, misinformed. These two
senior officials routinely briefed the media on progress with the program. Krushinski said he too misunderstood the data when briefed
on VA Retro Pay just a few weeks ago. It was only after he "sat down with
everybody and really went through the numbers, drilling into them, that I definitely
saw the problems we have here." Wrong numbers given "the media,"
he said, "led many people to believe we were closer to finishing the
project than we actually were." Lockheed Martin personnel trained to
screen retiree pay files have cleared 128,000 payments through 15 NOV. But only
84,300 potentially eligible retirees from the original 133,000 pool have had
pay files reviewed. Lockheed has been told to raise the number of full-time
personnel hired for the project by 16, to reach 98 in December, an official
said. Another factor for November's missed deadline was computer software
developed to automate retro pay calculations. It had an error rate of 17% and
had to be scrapped. "We really counted on that automation to allow us to
get out of manual processing," Krushinski said.
DFAS officials couldn't explain why that information wasn't shared with
retirees before now. [Source: Stars & Stripes 1 Dec 07 Tom Philpott
article ++]